The case for Scottish Independence is greater than ever before

By James Melville.

 

I have spent a lot time wrestling with my own opinion on Scottish independence as I will always consider myself both British and Scottish. But since 2013, I pivoted from being a unionist to a wholehearted supporter of Scottish independence.

For myself and many others, Independence is not about some sort of Braveheart tinged dislike of the English. I absolutely adore England and the English. It’s not about a desire for passports, anthems or sovereignty either. It’s about my homeland self determining a set of political values that are diametrically opposite to what has been happening at Westminster for many years now.

What’s driving so many Scots to consider saying yes to independence has less to do with their view of Scotland and more to do with what they believe has happened to British politics and governance at Westminster. Since 1979, Britain has been breaking away from what used to be called the postwar settlement. And since the EU referendum in 2016, where 62% of Scottish voters had their will ignored and face the prospect of being dragged out of the EU against their majority vote.

British politics has been tugged towards right-wing extremism. Yet, Scotland (like many parts of the UK) does not buy into this reactionary ideology. The prevailing political ethos of the past 35 years has been one of xenophobia, austerity and isolationism. And Scotland wants no part of it.

There is an ever-increasing desire in Scotland to “take back control” and obtain a civic nationalism based on self determination, inclusivity and liberal internationalism rather than being attached to a completely different ethnic-nationalism displayed by many key political influencers around Brexit. The SNP for instance, has a outward-looking policy on immigrants: it wants more of them.

2 out of 3 Scottish voters voted to stay in the EU – the UK government should be recognising that fact. Scotland is supposed to be one of four “equal partners” within constitutional rights in a union – as such, they should be treated as an equal. The will of the Scottish voters must be taken into account over the EU rather than being ignored. As such, another independence referendum gives Scottish voters the right to reply over self determination triggered by an undemocratic and unconstitutional framework within the Act of Union over the EU referendum.

Consider this: Scotland is governed by a UK Prime Minister, elected by only 160,000 Tory members, of which only 9,000 are based in Scotland, from a party that hasn’t won a major election in Scotland in 64 years, to deliver a Brexit that 62% of Scotland’s voters rejected.

All of this then, is driving so many Scots to consider making the break:- an increasing acknowledgement that Britain will never again return to the kind of progressive, social democratic and liberal values that still have a majority consensus in Scotland. It’s not that progressive Scots want to leave Britain – it’s that progressiveness in Britain has left them.

7 comments

      1. Oh, we know it’s important to distinguish between England and Scotland. Much as we enjoy the company of our friends on mainland Europe, it’s a difference they sometimes have difficulty getting their heads round.

        Like

  1. Who should the prime minister be elected by? In Johnstone’s Case he was elected as an mp by his constituents (with 51% of the vote) and again as Tory leader (with 66% of the vote).
    Now there may be leaders who got higher vote shares but let’s get one thing clear we don’t vote for prime ministers in the UK we vote for individual MPs who then choose the PM. If you think you are voting on a pm then you need to think again. In this respect BJ is no different than any other pm, he may be a total a**e but he’s as legitamate as any predecessor

    Liked by 2 people

  2. We do not need permission to hold an Independence referendum the USA didn’t in 1776. The Irish didn’t in 1926. I know you will say but blood had to be spilt. It doesnt’ have to be that way. The international community would condemn England if they went down that route.

    Like

  3. 1) Nationalism is a slippery slope, it is mostly driven by tribal instincts, it is the primary motivation for brex**t. Best avoided.
    2) if you listen carefully to the independence debate, there are ever present undertones of antagonism, reminding us of the tone of the brex**eers, Trumpists and Nationaliists of all persuasions. This has no place in civilised discourse.
    3) To strive for cooperation, to bring people together, to fight tribalism, is a defining human characteristic, separating us from animals driven by their amygdalic emotions. It’s such a hard, hard thing to do but so worth it. Think about the Good Friday agreement.
    4) Smiling Osborne gave us austerity, food banks, cuts to mental health services, and so important, youth services and Sure Start. But I challenge any of the people posting here to quantify how they personally have been made worse off by this heartless government.
    5) The monstrous crew who are “leading” us are revealed and their days are numbered. Please be patient and don’t abandon your fellow British and Irish.
    6) Let all right thinking English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Northern Irish eschew nationalism and work together for a better future, starting by defeating Brex*t.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s