Voting for the Tories is Political Stockholm Syndrome

By James Melville.

I have never voted for the Tories and I never will. I have never understood why people vote Tory. Voting for the Conservative Party is the political version of Stockholm Syndrome, which causes Tory voters to develop a psychological alliance with their political captors despite the consequences of voting for something that is so obviously against their best interests.

Since the early 1980s, successive Tory governments have dismantled the social contract where we pay our taxes for fully functioning public services. Under Thatcherism and then austerity, our public services have either been dismantled, asset stripped or sold off. Our public sector workers have endured an 8-year pay freeze in real terms since 2010.

The Tories try and refashion British society, but not in a good way. As well as rolling back the state to slash public services investment, they have wilfully neglected the poor and vulnerable and left many communities without any form of prosperity and hope. Since the Tories came to power in 2010, there has been a 165% increase in homelessness in England. Compare and contrast to Finland where homelessness levels have been reduced by 35% over the same period.

Over a million food banks supplies have been issued per year in the UK since 2016 – a massive increase from 40,000 food bank supplies in 2010. The official poverty rate (defined as those families living on incomes of less than 60% of the median income after accounting for housing costs) rose from 22.1% to 23.2% last year, the biggest single year jump since Margaret Thatcher was in power in 1988. This rise in poverty is inevitably linked to a decade of Tory austerity. The Tories have since 2010, frozen the nominal value of tax credits, child benefit, disability allowances and housing benefits.

The Tories destroyed many of our industrial heartlands in the 1980s. Many of these communities never recovered. The Thatcher era of Tory government accelerated the decline of shipbuilding, steel and mining, creating huge levels of deindustrialisation in the North, resulting in a 30-year period of regional inequality in Wales, Scotland and North of England compared to the more prosperous South East of England.

Despite this continued destruction of social policy, industry and public services over two separate generations, here we are today, facing another general election with the Tories 10 points ahead in the polls. The Tories have governed the UK for 59 of 90 years since 1929. So why do people keep voting for the Tories?

One of the most consistent findings in social psychology is that people find ways to believe whatever they want to believe. The Conservative Party has always been able to appeal to large numbers of people on the basis of faux-patriotism and on conning voters into thinking that they deliver economic growth and prosperity. They’ve managed to create a fake aura of competence. This is one of the biggest myths in the history of British politics. For instance, the national debt has doubled to £1.8 trillion since 2010 (despite austerity), yet Labour are blamed for ‘spending all the money’ despite the Blair government running at a surplus for four years and the Brown government coming up with a fiscal plan to deal with the financial crisis in 2009, which most of the G20 countries then followed.

The perception of Tory competence and how opposition parties ‘cannot be trusted’ gains traction because of millions of people ignore their potential for critical thinking by continuing to read the wrong newspapers. The vast majority of the British print media leans towards right-wing agendas. It doesn’t take much to work out that if millions of people are reading these newspapers or even just seeing their dog-whistle headlines on a daily basis, they are going to be influenced by them and subsequently obtain many misplaced perceived wisdoms and misguided viewpoints.

It becomes a form of brainwashing built up over decades to somehow trust the Tories and distrust trust any form of opposition to the Tories. Yet paradoxically, they are consistently voting for a party that attacks their own self interests. What does someone living on the minimum wage, living in a community with increased poverty or living on reduced benefits have in common with an over-privileged, multi-millionaire Tory politician who wilfully cuts public services? Absolutely nothing as far as I can see. But, somehow, the Tories manage to persuade gullible sections of voters to help put them and keep them in power.

And they are still at it with Brexit. Imagine being a political party that campaigns to reduce our economic growth by 3.5% per year over the next decade, That’s what  the Tories are currently asking people to vote for.

Brexit cultivators and Old Etonians Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg have absolutely nothing in common with the vast majority of voters. Yet many people believe that they are sticking it to the elite despite them being about as elite as it gets. Yet again, people tug at their collective forelocks and believe in a certain type of politician who clearly does not have their best interests at heart. They are voting for individuals who have dismantled their communities, public services and infrastructures and yet are now willing to trust them again to deliver Brexit, and ‘take back control’ despite overwhelming evidence that suggests that the poorest communities will be hit hardest by Brexit.

The greatest British political tragedy in the modern era is the susceptibility of millions of voters to vote for the Tories. It is a tragic self defeating vote for more pain. It is a pattern that continually repeats and repeats. It is a tragic example of a never-ending cycle of Stockholm Syndrome in British politics and society.

6 comments

  1. I have said it many times that I find it incomprehensible that ordinary people keep voting Tory. They have pulled off the greatest con trick of all time.

    Like

  2. I’m pleased to see someone else using the term ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ to describe the UK voter’s (well, many of them) irrational & self-destructive attachment to the Tories – it was the only explanation I could find for such obviously self-defeating behaviour.

    Part of it also hinges on this nonsense about ‘reducing the deficit’; in light of the EU’s January 2020 roll-out of their Anti-Tax-Avoidance-Directive (ATAD), expect the administration of the UK Public Finance Act 2019 to be a wet-bus-ticket effort in comparison. Meanwhile, selectively destructive austerity continues to create a ‘social deficit’ of gargantuan proportions, all of which will prove ruinously expensive as crime & hopelessness enlarge the UK prison population.

    The Tories continue to get away with their behaviour because their 2011 ‘fake’ AV referendum on voting reform (‘fake’ because AV would’ve made very little effective difference to the make-up of the HoC) enabled them to retain the comfortable safety-net afforded them by First-Past-The-Post voting. I seriously doubt if the UK has any chance of beneficial change until FPTP is replaced by Single Transferable Vote or (my preference) Mixed Member Proportional voting. Only when new minor parties have a reasonable chance of equitable representation in the HoC will the Tory hegemony be broken. Of course, expect the pro-Tory gutter press to produce its usual output of half-truths & misrepresentation on that subject.

    Like

  3. It’s not that people have a Stockholm Syndrome relationship with the Tories, it’s that the majority of people think middle class metropolitan hard liberals, whether cultural or economic, do not represent their interests whatsoever despite their faux concern for the poor and the vulnerable.

    Like

    1. I think the Stockholm Syndrome reference is largely accurate. And being from a London working class background, and my wife being from a northern working class background we know very many people that this analogy applies to very accurately, including our own parents. The majority of the people I’m talking about don’t give a moment’s thought about middle class metropolitan liberals. They just get unknowingly manipulated by what they read in the Sun, Rxpress or the Mail or hear down the pub from other readers of the same barely disguised propaganda. Just because some of us have been lucky enough to get a decent education and good job doesn’t render our wish for a fairer society “faux” . What is faux is the Tories absurd claims to be a one-nation party.

      Like

      1. Sounds to me you are just parroting the usual sanctimonious Guardian/Mirror propoganda. Ie, you now know what is best for the country and the ‘uneducated’ electorate without questioning your own hard liberal agenda.

        How is Labour going to halt the growth of the UK’s massive ecological debt?

        What’s is your educated London-centric answer?

        Like

      2. Well I wish I did have all the answers but I willingly admit that I don’t. And, for what it’s worth, I also share your concerns about Labour’s ability ( or any of the main political parties’ ) ability to tackle the climate crisis. The sooner we get some form of proportional representation in order to break the Labour/Tory stranglehold on government the better (for the whole country, not just London).

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s